Skip to main content

The Election Is Coming; But Are Your Candidates Legit? Attendance Rule Under the Spotlight.




By Public Voice News Agency

The recent pre-election period has cast a glaring spotlight on an issue that threatens the integrity of the National Association of Public Administration Students (NAPAS): a significant number of aspiring candidates for executive and parliamentary positions do not meet the constitutionally mandated attendance requirement.

According to the NAPAS Constitution, Article V, Section 34, Subsection (II), every candidate vying for executive offices or seats in the House of Parliament must have attended at least 50% of congressional sittings, except for first-year and new Direct Entry students participating in by-elections.

This clause is not a bureaucratic technicality. It is a fundamental safeguard designed to ensure that only dedicated, informed, and engaged members qualify for leadership. Meeting this attendance threshold means a candidate has actively participated in the association’s key decision-making forums, demonstrating commitment, awareness, and accountability.

However, the current landscape tells a different story. Numerous candidates seeking office have failed to meet this attendance benchmark, a fact confirmed by attendance records yet often overlooked in the rush to the election.

The implications of ignoring this constitutional safeguard are profound:
  • Legitimacy Eroded: Leaders who have not demonstrated consistent participation risk lacking the mandate and moral authority to represent their peers effectively.

  • Weak Governance: Leadership without adequate involvement can lead to poor decision-making, disconnected representation, and diminished trust in the association.

  • Precedent for Disregard: Allowing non-compliant candidates to run sets a dangerous precedent, undermining the rule of law within NAPAS and encouraging apathy.

The path forward is clear and non-negotiable:

  • Strict Adherence to Article V, Section 34 (II) must be enforced by the electoral committee and all relevant authorities.

  • Transparency in Candidate Screening is paramount to preserve the association’s credibility.

  • Members Must Demand Accountability to protect the integrity of their leadership.

Leadership is a privilege earned through consistent engagement and responsibility. The attendance rule is more than a checklist — it is a reflection of commitment to the association’s vision and a prerequisite for effective stewardship.

NAPAS stands at a crossroads: uphold its constitution and the standards that have kept it vibrant, or allow shortcuts that threaten to dilute its impact.

The choice is clear. The time for laxity is over.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget Showdown at NAPAS: President Storms Out, Returns to Face Apology Standoff

The parliamentary sitting of the National Association of Public Administration Students (NAPAS), OAU, on November 15, 2024, was one for the books. From unexpected delays to fiery budget battles, the session had its fair share of drama. Here’s a breakdown of what went down. A Late Start, But We Move Scheduled for 10:00 AM, the sitting didn’t officially kick off until 10:50 AM, thanks to late arrivals and unforeseen hiccups. The Speaker, showing true leadership, apologized on behalf of the House. The session then opened with a prayer led by the General Secretary and a heartfelt rendition of the school anthem. Roll call came next, with names called in groups: Napasites, Public Voice representatives, Executive members, and Parliamentarians. A few smiles filled the room as some names had to be called twice before responses were heard. The session also marked a significant moment as the newly appointed Treasurer took the oath of office. Administered by the Speaker, the swearing-in...

Not Worth the Dues? NAPAS Students Decry Package Quality

By Public Voice News Agency What began as a long-anticipated disbursement quickly unraveled into a wave of discontent on Tuesday, May 6th, as members of the National Association of Public Administration Students (NAPAS), Obafemi Awolowo University, expressed deep dissatisfaction over the quality and value of their long-awaited departmental packages. The delay in distribution had already raised eyebrows, with students, especially freshers ,  growing restless after months of waiting. Expectations were high. But when the Financial Secretary, through the Public Relations Officer (PRO), invited students to the Departmental President’s office for collection, the excitement fizzled into frustration. Present at the collection point were the Financial Secretary, the PRO, and the General Secretary. For stalites , the package consisted of just one item: a department-branded crest. “It’s not just about getting something it’s about getting something useful,” said Oluwatobiloba, a Part 3 student...

“Indefinite Suspension.” “Impeached.” “Removed.” — Yesterday’s Sitting Was No Joke!

By Public Voice News Agency The NAPAS parliamentary chamber roared back into activity on what should have been a quiet afternoon, as the legislative arm of the association met for what turned out to be a gripping session of debates, decisions, and disciplinary actions. The sitting, scheduled for 3:00 PM, officially began at 3:54 PM with an opening prayer led by the PLO, followed by a solemn rendition of the Great Ife Anthem. The reading of the last sitting’s minutes by the Clerk of the House marked the formal opening. The motion for adoption was moved by Hon. Kanmi and seconded by the Speaker, setting the stage for what would become a drama-filled sitting. Audit Committee Under Fire An early flashpoint emerged when only three out of eight members of the Audit Committee were present—a quorum failure that drew immediate concern. Tension heightened when Napasite Segun, raised a constitutional question: Why was the Acting Editor-in-Chief of Public Voice serving on the committee at al...