By Public Voice News Agency
The NAPAS parliamentary chamber roared back into activity on what should have been a quiet afternoon, as the legislative arm of the association met for what turned out to be a gripping session of debates, decisions, and disciplinary actions.
The sitting, scheduled for 3:00 PM, officially began at 3:54 PM with an opening prayer led by the PLO, followed by a solemn rendition of the Great Ife Anthem. The reading of the last sitting’s minutes by the Clerk of the House marked the formal opening. The motion for adoption was moved by Hon. Kanmi and seconded by the Speaker, setting the stage for what would become a drama-filled sitting.
Audit Committee Under Fire
An early flashpoint emerged when only three out of eight members of the Audit Committee were present—a quorum failure that drew immediate concern. Tension heightened when Napasite Segun, raised a constitutional question: Why was the Acting Editor-in-Chief of Public Voice serving on the committee at all citing that this must be an oversight on the President's end?
The president defended her inclusion stating it was no oversight whatsoever, citing that the constitution permits any non-executive to serve therefore he requested an apology from Napasite Segun which was in turn overruled. But a deeper interpretation came from Justice Joel, the Registrar of the Judicial Council, referencing Article 6, Section 6(iv) of the NAPAS Constitution which was earlier cited, he clarified that anyone who receives budgetary allocations should not serve on the Audit Committee a measure designed to preserve impartiality and integrity.
In line with this ruling, the Speaker promptly declared that the Acting EIC could no longer serve on the committee. She was formally removed, reinforcing the chamber’s stand on transparency.
Electoral Committee and Shadows Over Fresher's Party Funds
But the air thickened when financial questions surrounding the Fresher's Party were revisited.
A particularly contentious issue: after investigation from the Investigative committee of the house as well as the speakers'. the unexplained disappearance of ₦70,000 from the event's VIP table revenue. Out of ₦120,000 raised, only ₦23,000 made it to the departmental purse. Where the remaining funds went remains a mystery.
The Director of Socials (DoS) found himself on the hot seat as the House demanded explanations. He claimed the investigative committee had never reached out to confirm whether payments were made. Yet, his credibility took a major hit when it was revealed he hadn’t submitted a breakdown of how the money was spent.
The Speaker, visibly frustrated, noted that the DoS had developed “a pattern of irresponsibility.” His two-week suspension and ₦5,000 fine from a previous incident were still pending—he had served the suspension but had not paid the fine.
In a dramatic escalation, the House moved for an indefinite suspension of the DoS. His reinstatement, according to the Speaker, would only be considered “when the House deems it fit.”
Dinner Budget Tossed Out, Executive Replacement Ordered
AOB: Misconduct, Absenteeism, and a Shock Impeachment
Under Any Other Business, Hon. Kanmi presented a letter of complaint from the executive arm alleging dereliction of duty by the Assistant General Secretary (AGS). The President confirmed his dissatisfaction, while Napasite Pelumi curiously suggested the AGS still be given a Certificate of Service.
The House disagreed. In an unexpected turn, the AGS was impeached, with immediate effect, thereby putting a halt to the rumours that she would be contestting for the position of the general secretary in the coming Departmenal Elections as the NAPAS Constitution clearly states in Article VII, Section 36 (IV) A dismissed or removed officer of the Association shall not be eligible to contest any association election for a period of 2 academic sessions.
Napasite Pelumi also raised concerns about the poor attendance of Honourables. A resolution was passed: all absentees must submit formal apology letters to the NAPAS Parlour, and any Honourable who failed to communicate their absence would face appropriate sanctions. Honourable Trust was consequently impeached for failing to comply with the house rules on attendance.
Closure
The meeting closed with a motion for adjournment moved by the Deputy Clerk and adopted by the Clerk of the House. A final prayer was led by Napasite Segun.
Editor’s Note: This sitting revealed more than routine deliberations—it exposed deep rifts in administrative accountability and showcased the Parliament’s resolve to uphold its constitution. With suspensions, impeachments, and a shadow of financial irregularities, the next sitting promises to be even more consequential.
Comments
Post a Comment